—ᯛᮟᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᯏᮝᮑᮔᮑ’ᮣ ᮀᮕᮢᮣᮠᮕᮓᮤᮙᮦᮕ—
ᯖᮟᮧ ᮔᮙᮔ ᮙᮤ ᮕᮞᮔ ᮥᮠ ᮜᮙᮛᮕ ᮤᮘᮙᮣᯍ ᮇᮑᮣ ᮙᮤ ᮢᮕᮑᮜᮜᮩ ᮒᮕᮓᮑᮥᮣᮕ ᯗ ᮛᮕᮠᮤ ᮠᮥᮤᮤᮙᮞᮗ ᮠᮢᮕᮣᮣᮥᮢᮕ ᮟᮞ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙᯍ ᯗ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮓᮕᮢᮤᮑᮙᮞ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮜᮟᮦᮕᮔ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞᮼ ᮀᮕᮢᮘᮑᮠᮣ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮚᮥᮣᮤ ᮑ ᮖᮑᮓᮑᮔᮕ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮠᮥᮤ ᮟᮞᮺ ᮣᮕᮞᮣᮙᮞᮗ ᮝᮩ ᮟᮧᮞ ᮔᮕᮣᮙᮢᮕᮣᮼ
ᯐᮥᮤ ᮕᮦᮕᮞ ᮣᮟᮼᮼᮼ ᯗ ᮖᮙᮞᮔ ᮙᮤ ᮘᮑᮢᮔ ᮤᮟ ᮒᮕᮜᮙᮕᮦᮕ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮘᮑᮢᮒᮟᮢᮕᮔ ᮕᮞᮟᮥᮗᮘ ᮘᮑᮤᮢᮕᮔ ᮤᮟ ᮓᮘᮕᮑᮤᮺ ᮚᮥᮣᮤ ᮜᮙᮛᮕ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮝᮑᮞ ᮔᮙᮔᮺ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮗᮟ ᮑᮣ ᮖᮑᮢ ᮑᮣ ᮖᮢᮑᮝᮙᮞᮗ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮒᮕᮤᮢᮑᮩᮙᮞᮗ ᮘᮙᮝᮼ ᯏᮤ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮦᮕᮢᮩ ᮜᮕᮑᮣᮤᮺ ᯗ ᮔᮟᮞ’ᮤ ᮒᮕᮜᮙᮕᮦᮕ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ ᮕᮦᮕᮢ ᮔᮙᮔ ᮑᮞᮩᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮟ ᮔᮕᮣᮕᮢᮦᮕ ᮒᮕᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮢᮕᮑᮤᮕᮔ ᮣᮟ ᮘᮟᮢᮢᮙᮒᮜᮩᮼ
ᯗ ᮖᮕᮕᮜ ᮑ ᮣᮕᮞᮣᮕ ᮟᮖ ᮘᮑᮤᮢᮕᮔ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮔᮙᮣᮑᮠᮠᮟᮙᮞᮤᮝᮕᮞᮤ ᮣᮟ ᮣᮤᮢᮟᮞᮗ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᯗ ᮓᮑᮞ ᮘᮑᮢᮔᮜᮩ ᮒᮕᮜᮙᮕᮦᮕ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮙᮣ ᮝᮩ ᮟᮧᮞ ᮔᮑᮥᮗᮘᮤᮕᮢᮼ
ᮀᮕᮢᮘᮑᮠᮣ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮣᮕᮑᮢᮓᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮖᮟᮢ ᮑ ᮖᮑᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮖᮙᮗᮥᮢᮕᮼ ᮄᮟ ᮘᮕᮢᮺ ᮘᮕᮢ ᮒᮙᮟᮜᮟᮗᮙᮓᮑᮜ ᮖᮑᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮘᮑᮔ ᮣᮥᮔᮔᮕᮞᮜᮩ ᮦᮑᮞᮙᮣᮘᮕᮔᮺ ᮧᮘᮙᮓᮘ ᮜᮕᮖᮤ ᮘᮕᮢ ᮔᮕᮕᮠᮜᮩ ᮔᮕᮠᮢᮕᮣᮣᮕᮔᮼ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮟᮞᮕ ᮧᮘᮟ ᮖᮙᮜᮜᮕᮔ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮦᮟᮙᮔᮼ ᯐᮕᮓᮑᮥᮣᮕ ᮘᮕ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮛᮙᮞᮔᮕᮢ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮝᮟᮢᮕ ᮓᮟᮝᮠᮟᮣᮕᮔ ᮤᮘᮑᮞ ᮝᮟᮣᮤ ᮒᮟᮩᮣ ᮘᮙᮣ ᮑᮗᮕᮺ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮝᮙᮗᮘᮤ ᮘᮑᮦᮕ ᮒᮕᮕᮞ ᮜᮟᮟᮛᮙᮞᮗ ᮖᮟᮢ ᮑ ᮖᮑᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮙᮞ ᮘᮙᮝ ᮙᮞᮣᮤᮕᮑᮔ ᮟᮖ ᮑ ᮜᮟᮦᮕᮢᮼ
“ᯗ ᮓᮑᮞ’ᮤ ᮣᮤᮑᮩ ᮝᮑᮢᮢᮙᮕᮔ ᮤᮟ ᮩᮟᮥ ᮑᮞᮩᮝᮟᮢᮕᮼ”
ᯓᮦᮕᮢᮩᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮜᮙᮛᮕᮜᮩ ᮒᮕᮗᮑᮞ ᮤᮟ ᮖᮑᮜᮜ ᮑᮠᮑᮢᮤ ᮖᮢᮟᮝ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮔᮑᮩ ᮤᮘᮟᮣᮕ ᮧᮟᮢᮔᮣ ᮧᮕᮢᮕ ᮣᮥᮔᮔᮕᮞᮜᮩ ᮣᮠᮟᮛᮕᮞᮼ ᯓᮦᮕᮞ ᮤᮘᮕᮞᮺ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮗᮕᮑᮢᮣ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮧᮕ ᮝᮑᮞᮑᮗᮕᮔ ᮤᮟ ᮛᮕᮕᮠ ᮤᮥᮢᮞᮙᮞᮗ ᮧᮙᮤᮘ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮣᮥᮠᮠᮟᮢᮤ ᮟᮖ ᮤᮘᮕ ᯏᮟᮞᮟ ᮖᮑᮝᮙᮜᮩ ᮧᮕᮢᮕ ᮖᮢᮑᮗᮙᮜᮕᯉ ᮤᮘᮕᮩ ᮓᮟᮜᮜᮑᮠᮣᮕᮔ ᮙᮞ ᮑᮞ ᮙᮞᮣᮤᮑᮞᮤ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮝᮟᮝᮕᮞᮤ ᮤᮘᮕᮩ ᮧᮕᮢᮕ ᮝᮕᮤ ᮧᮙᮤᮘ ᮟᮥᮤᮣᮙᮔᮕ ᮠᮢᮕᮣᮣᮥᮢᮕᮼ
“ᮇᮘᮑᮤ ᮑᮒᮟᮥᮤ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙᯍ”
ᯗ ᮘᮑᮔ ᮠᮢᮕᮣᮣᮕᮔ ᮘᮙᮝ ᮖᮟᮢ ᮑᮞ ᮑᮞᮣᮧᮕᮢᮼ
“ᯗᮤ’ᮣ ᮒᮕᮤᮤᮕᮢ ᮙᮖ ᮩᮟᮥ ᮕᮨᮠᮜᮑᮙᮞ ᮙᮤ ᮢᮑᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮤᮘᮑᮞ ᮝᮕ ᮤᮕᮜᮜᮙᮞᮗ ᮘᮕᮢ ᮔᮙᮢᮕᮓᮤᮜᮩᮼ ᮄᮘᮑᮤ ᮧᮑᮩᮺ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙ ᮧᮟᮞ’ᮤ ᮘᮑᮦᮕ ᮤᮟ ᮗᮕᮤ ᮘᮥᮢᮤᮼ”
ᮇᮙᮤᮘ ᮤᮘᮑᮤᮺ ᮘᮕ ᮦᮑᮞᮙᮣᮘᮕᮔᮼ ᮇᮕ ᮘᮑᮦᮕᮞ’ᮤ ᮣᮕᮕᮞ ᮕᮑᮓᮘ ᮟᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮟᮞᮓᮕ ᮣᮙᮞᮓᮕ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮔᮑᮩᮼ
ᯚᮟᮟᮛᮙᮞᮗ ᮒᮑᮓᮛᮺ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮔᮕᮓᮙᮣᮙᮟᮞ ᮠᮢᮟᮒᮑᮒᮜᮩ ᮧᮑᮣᮞ’ᮤ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮢᮙᮗᮘᮤ ᮟᮞᮕᮼ ᮇᮘᮙᮜᮕ ᮙᮤ’ᮣ ᮤᮢᮥᮕ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮙᮤ ᮣᮠᮑᮢᮕᮔ ᮑ ᮩᮟᮥᮞᮗ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙ ᮖᮢᮟᮝ ᮥᮞᮞᮕᮓᮕᮣᮣᮑᮢᮩ ᮠᮑᮙᮞᮺ ᯗ ᮤᮘᮙᮞᮛ ᮙᮤ ᮧᮑᮢᮠᮕᮔ ᮣᮟᮝᮕᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮙᮞᮣᮙᮔᮕ ᮘᮕᮢᮼ ᯜᮟᮺ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ’ᮣ ᮚᮥᮣᮤ ᮑᮞᮟᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮕᮨᮓᮥᮣᮕᮼ ᯏᮖᮤᮕᮢ ᮑᮜᮜᮺ ᯗ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮟᮞᮕ ᮧᮘᮟ ᮢᮑᮙᮣᮕᮔ ᮘᮕᮢᮼ
ᮄᮘᮕ ᯏᮟᮞᮟᮣ ᮥᮣᮕᮔ ᮤᮟ ᮣᮑᮩᮺ “ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙᮻᮓᮘᮑᮞ ᮓᮑᮞ ᮓᮟᮝᮕ ᮟᮦᮕᮢ ᮤᮟ ᮠᮜᮑᮩ ᮧᮘᮕᮞᮕᮦᮕᮢ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮜᮙᮛᮕᮣ ᮣᮟ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮧᮟᮞ’ᮤ ᮖᮕᮕᮜ ᮜᮟᮞᮕᮜᮩᮼ” ᮄᮘᮕᮢᮕ ᮧᮕᮢᮕ ᮤᮙᮝᮕᮣ ᮤᮘᮕᮩ ᮕᮦᮕᮞ ᮖᮕᮔ ᮘᮕᮢᮼ ᯗ ᮝᮑᮔᮕ ᮣᮥᮢᮕ ᮤᮟ ᮠᮑᮩ ᮤᮘᮕᮝᮺ ᮒᮥᮤ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮧᮑᮣᮞ᮵ᮤ ᮕᮞᮟᮥᮗᮘᮼ ᮀᮕᮢᮘᮑᮠᮣ ᯗ ᮑᮜᮜᮟᮧᮕᮔ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙ ᮤᮟ ᮒᮕᮜᮙᮕᮦᮕ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮣᮥᮓᮘ ᮘᮑᮠᮠᮙᮞᮕᮣᮣ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮣᮟᮝᮕᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮟ ᮒᮕ ᮤᮑᮛᮕᮞ ᮖᮟᮢ ᮗᮢᮑᮞᮤᮕᮔᮼ
ᮄᮘᮕ ᮟᮜᮔᮕᮢ ᯗ ᮗᮕᮤᮺ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮝᮟᮢᮕ ᯗ ᮢᮕᮑᮜᮙ᮪ᮕ ᮙᮤᮼ ᯛᮕᮕᮤᮙᮞᮗ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮒᮕᮙᮞᮗ ᮣᮥᮢᮢᮟᮥᮞᮔᮕᮔ ᮒᮩ ᮣᮥᮓᮘ ᮑ ᮛᮙᮞᮔ ᮖᮑᮝᮙᮜᮩ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮞᮟᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮣᮘᮟᮢᮤ ᮟᮖ ᮑ ᮝᮙᮢᮑᮓᮜᮕᮼ ᯗ ᮤᮘᮟᮥᮗᮘᮤ ᯗ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮤᮕᮑᮓᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮘᮕᮢ ᮤᮘᮑᮤᮺ ᮒᮥᮤ ᮠᮕᮢᮘᮑᮠᮣ ᯗ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮟᮞᮜᮩ ᮠᮥᮤᮤᮙᮞᮗ ᮝᮟᮢᮕ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮝᮟᮢᮕ ᮠᮢᮕᮣᮣᮥᮢᮕ ᮟᮞ ᮝᮩ ᮔᮑᮥᮗᮘᮤᮕᮢᮼ
ᯏᮖᮤᮕᮢ ᮤᮑᮣᮤᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮛᮙᮞᮔ ᮟᮖ ᮘᮑᮠᮠᮙᮞᮕᮣᮣᮺ ᮖᮙᮞᮔᮙᮞᮗ ᮑᮞᮩᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮗᮢᮕᮑᮤᮕᮢ ᮧᮟᮥᮜᮔ ᮒᮕ…
ᯏ ᮢᮕᮡᮥᮕᮣᮤ ᮖᮟᮢ ᮣᮕᮤᮤᮜᮕᮝᮕᮞᮤ ᮝᮟᮞᮕᮩ ᮘᮑᮣ ᮑᮜᮢᮕᮑᮔᮩ ᮑᮢᮢᮙᮦᮕᮔ ᮖᮢᮟᮝ ᮤᮘᮕ ᯏᮟᮞᮟ ᮖᮑᮝᮙᮜᮩᮼ ᮇᮘᮙᮜᮕ ᮙᮤ ᮧᮟᮥᮜᮔ ᮒᮕ ᮣᮤᮑᮞᮔᮑᮢᮔ ᮠᮢᮑᮓᮤᮙᮓᮕ ᮤᮟ ᮓᮟᮞᮣᮥᮜᮤ ᮑ ᮜᮑᮧᮩᮕᮢ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮣᮕᮕᮛ ᮑ ᮢᮕᮔᮥᮓᮤᮙᮟᮞᮺ ᯗ ᮘᮑᮦᮕ ᮑᮜᮢᮕᮑᮔᮩ ᮙᮞᮖᮟᮢᮝᮕᮔ ᮤᮘᮕᮝ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᯗ ᮧᮙᮜᮜ ᮠᮑᮩ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮖᮥᮜᮜ ᮑᮝᮟᮥᮞᮤᮼ ᯗᮤ ᮙᮣ ᮑ ᮣᮥᮝ ᯗ ᮓᮑᮞ ᮓᮟᮦᮕᮢ ᮒᮩ ᮥᮣᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮖᮥᮞᮔᮣ ᯗ ᮘᮑᮔ ᮣᮑᮦᮕᮔ ᮖᮟᮢ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙ’ᮣ ᮓᮟᮜᮜᮕᮗᮕ ᮕᮔᮥᮓᮑᮤᮙᮟᮞᮼ
ᯗ ᮕᮦᮕᮞ ᮖᮙᮞᮔ ᮝᮩᮣᮕᮜᮖ ᮘᮟᮠᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮝᮟᮞᮕᮩ ᮧᮙᮜᮜ ᮒᮕ ᮥᮣᮕᮔ ᮖᮟᮢ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ’ᮣ ᮣᮑᮛᮕᮼ ᮇᮕ ᮘᮑᮦᮕ ᮜᮕᮖᮤ ᮑ ᮤᮢᮕᮝᮕᮞᮔᮟᮥᮣ ᮧᮟᮥᮞᮔ ᮙᮞ ᮘᮙᮣ ᮘᮕᮑᮢᮤ—ᮑ ᮧᮟᮥᮞᮔ ᮣᮟ ᮔᮕᮕᮠ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮙᮤ ᮧᮙᮜᮜ ᮒᮕ ᮔᮙᮖᮖᮙᮓᮥᮜᮤ ᮤᮟ ᮘᮕᮑᮜᮼ ᯗ ᮑᮝ ᮑᮧᮑᮢᮕ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮘᮙᮣ ᮤᮑᮜᮕᮞᮤᮣ ᮑᮢᮕ ᮒᮜᮟᮟᮝᮙᮞᮗ ᮙᮞ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮧᮟᮢᮜᮔ ᮟᮖ ᮜᮙᮤᮕᮢᮑᮤᮥᮢᮕᮼ
ᮃᮙᮞᮓᮕ ᮝᮩ ᮔᮑᮥᮗᮘᮤᮕᮢ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮓᮑᮥᮣᮕ ᮟᮖ ᮘᮙᮣ ᮣᮥᮖᮖᮕᮢᮙᮞᮗᮺ ᯗ ᮝᮑᮩ ᮞᮟᮤ ᮘᮑᮦᮕ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮢᮙᮗᮘᮤ ᮤᮟ ᮖᮕᮕᮜ ᮤᮘᮙᮣ ᮧᮑᮩᮼ ᮃᮤᮙᮜᮜᮺ ᮙᮤ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮖᮢᮥᮣᮤᮢᮑᮤᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮑᮜᮜ ᯗ ᮓᮟᮥᮜᮔ ᮔᮟ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮠᮢᮑᮩ ᮖᮟᮢ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ ᮤᮟ ᮖᮙᮞᮔ ᮕᮦᮕᮞ ᮗᮢᮕᮑᮤᮕᮢ ᮘᮑᮠᮠᮙᮞᮕᮣᮣᮼ
holy crappachino! even Eiji didn’t receive this much support. as for her mother being Miyuki’s biggest victim… NO! it is still Eiji. the mother is nowhere near to being driven to suicide. from the Aonos’ perspective she is not a victim, she is a legal guardian of one of the people who almost drove Eiji to suicide. forgive and forget and be friends again, really? are you people serious??? oh yeah, let’s not file charges at all, right? should a child’s crimes be ignored because it is the parent/guardian that is responsible for reparations? they are good people, yes, but that doesn’t mean they should let others walk over them. Aonos filed charges against the guilty parties, they don’t need to consider who is actually paying for damages. assault, false incrimination and bullying were enough reason.
is it because a woman always has to be the biggest culprit, or that she was the only one with emotional ties to Eiji, or… however Miyuki wasn’t the prime evil. every time she did something there was Kondo behind her telling her to say this or do that or think thusly. he was manipulating her from the start, putting down Eiji and making her more and more dependent on him. on her own she did very little. it was also her rotten luck to have a ‘best’ friend who wanted to get with Kondo and in hopes of that pushed Miyuki into Kondo’s claws. i will never understand why during all those months they were a couple, why she never talked about these things with Eiji, but her frenemy instead. i’ve experienced something similar firsthand from the boyfriend perspective when i was younger and didn’t understand it then either. oh well, i’ve never been a young maiden.
i wouldn’t mind at all for both Miyuki and her mother to eventually heal and go forward as family, neither deserves to suffer needlessly.
now that miyuki cant go to college, she’ll probably be working many odd jobs for the rest of her life, cleaning, sweeping, putting fries in the bag, etc
Honestly better than any office job in Japan
@Sjjss: If that girl Miyuki truly cared about Eiji, she would never have let another man take away all of her firsts that she should have been saving for the man that she was swearing she was going to marry!
She should never have let that snake Kondo enter their relationship and take away her wedding purity that should rightfully have been Eiji’s.
She should have stopped herself from going down the wrong path the moment she was propositioned by Kondo and gone straight to Eiji and told him everything.
That alone would have been enough to show her loyalty to the man she claimed she wanted to marry and save her relationship with him and the Aono family.
But what did she do?… she continued to cheat even deeper, thinking ‘It will be okay as long as Eiji never finds out about it , I will have this secret relationship to get experience for a while and then I will go back to being Eiji’s…’, little knowing that other people in their circle are already observing her cheating.
Then the one thing that she dreaded about happening was realized. The man she claimed to have loved caught her in the act of cheating on him with another man. And when her affair partner forced her to decide between them, she chose the affair partner and belittled the man who she said she wanted to marry.
Now ask yourself: Say you had a girlfriend that everyone was making fun of in the beginning, and only became popular because you stood beside her and taught her that self confidence… only to betray you the first chance that she got… Would YOU want To marry a woman who basically told you to your face that she would choose her affair partner over you? Who slandered you and sought out to destroy your reputation to save her own position in the school where she knew that she would be destroyed once the truth came out? Would you forgive that girl later when she came crying back to you only because when she saw you with somebody 10 times better than her in less than 24 hours?!
I think I speak for any guy out there with common sense:
NOPE! NO times NO, Divided by NO, To the power of ’OH HELL NO’!!!
Miyuki’s mother doesn’t know half the story. She tries to find logic in her daughter’s actions. That’s why she blames herself excessively and looks for reasons to explain what she did.
If Miyuki truly regrets it, then she has to be honest and tell her the whole truth: why she did what she did and what she was thinking while she was doing it. Even the things that shame her so much they make her want to vomit (like telling herself she deserved more than one man, how she let people talk badly about Eiji because it made her feel better about herself and less insecure, how she intended to continue their romance for another six months, etc.). Perhaps she also followed Kondo despite knowing he wasn’t trustworthy because he offered her the chance to be bad without consequences, and she liked that fantasy of power.
Nah
This is what I’ve been thinking all along. Miyuki should have at least kept her purity knowing that she still want to go back to Eiji, Eiji is kind and I bet he can still forgive her if it’s only about cheating alone.
The fact that she gave even that purity to a snake of a guy, proves that she’s not strong enough to hold her words of marrying Eiji in the future firmly. She’s just an unfaithful, ungrateful, greedy, and stupid kind of a woman.
Yes, Miyuki did care for Eiji despite what some will say. It’s clear that even while receiving attention and having people who love her it won’t be enough to fill up that void which her father left. Do not listen to what some people will say that Miyuki truly never cared because it’s a lie. She still betrayed Eiji and deserves the consequences, but her having never cared is a lie.
She only “cares” about Eiji now because she is alone. She wouldn’t have gone as far as to destroy Eiji in the first place if she truly cared. The least she could’ve done when she got caught was to just ignore and leave Eiji be. But no, she chose to double down and slander. I don’t see which part of that is “caring”. She’s just confused now because she’s desperate. If things didn’t escalate and she was in a better situation, she’d probably just move on with her life with Kondo and forget Eiji. Remember that when the situation was just starting to worsen, what she first sought was Kondo’s comfort. She did not give a damn about consequences nor Eiji’s feelings.
i feel like this is too simple because the story supports she did care for him deeply but she always chose herself never expressing that “care” properly in action.
i feel like this is too simple because the story supports she did care for him deeply but she always chose herself never expressing that “care” properly in action.
Stop fooling yourself. There wasn’t a single time she cared. What you’re reading is Miyuki’s desperate thoughts so of course it looks like she cares. What do you think she meant when she said- if Senpai wasn’t there, Eiji will be the only man beside me? It’s not Eiji that she cared about, it’s having a man beside her. She doesn’t give a damn who it is. Eiji just happened to be his boyfriend, childhood friend, and the only boy close to her ever since. He was the perfect person to fulfill that spot. Despite all of that, she never tried to defend Eiji when she had plenty of chances. That really cemented the fact that she never truly thought for Eiji’s sake. Why? Because to her, Eiji was simply replaceable. She prioritized her own standing and relationship with Kondo.
What was the point of trying to slander Eiji? It really makes you think. No matter which way you look, it was a totally unnecessary act and just added fuel to the fire. To begin with, when Eiji caught her, she could’ve just kept quiet and let the person move on. But she’s crazy so nope. You might say that she was in a bad spot and was forced to appease Kondo, but sorry to say, she was the one who implanted the idea to Kondo about Eiji being abusive to begin with. Kondo was merely parroting her at the time. Again, that was totally unnecessary. She can keep her affair in secret without having to Eiji throw under the bus. Well then, you might say she just made a story up to appease Kondo and she knows Eiji will just forgive her. What does that make Eiji then? A convenient person.
She did not have intentions of breaking up with Eiji- that at least is true. Whether it’s out of “caring” is highly questionable. In my eyes, she already prepared to move to Kondo but tried to keep Eiji on a leash, as a safeguard.
Toxic people think they care when they actually don’t and they don’t realize it. Yeah sure, it still might be some form of “caring” in their eyes and that’s the only thing that matters. If that’s your argument, then there’s no point in this discussion. I pity you for thinking that way however. If you don’t but still find to disagree, give more convincing arguments.
Ok incel
Without a doubt she definitely did care for him the story and author quite literally support this but that’s why I also made a clear distinction between caring in feeling but failing to do so in action. But then again no matter what I state you’re going to disagree because you have a different perspective.
I just don’t think this reading of myuki’s character is correct because she thinks eiji not because he’s a convent person or there’s no by her side but to show how much value eiji has on her. I feel like thats the reason why the story shows a clear distinction of how losing eiji in comparison to kondo had clear greater effect.
Miyuki’s moms forced suffering and compensation are the worst part of the story. It makes little sense to punish her. Also for how kind the author makes Eiji out to be and how lovely his family is to the point of being a treasure to many why are they so heartless to not see her in the hospital. The mom had nothing to do with her daughters actions.
I think it’s fair, she’s Miyuki’s parent after all. Both Miyuki’s mom and the Aonos are victims and are still recovering. It makes sense for Eiji’s mom to visit her old friend but being the mother of Eiji who is the biggest victim, focusing on him is the top priority. If she does decide to see Miyuki’s mom, she’d likely talk to Eiji first once he’s completely recovered.
You’re contradicting yourself saying it’s fair but then pointing out Miyuki’s mom is also a victim. I understand the Aono’s family is recovering together I don’t blame his mom for being preoccupied. I do however blame them for pursuing compensation from Miyuki’s family for the sins of Miyuki it’s uncharacteristic of the whole story and who the Aonos are shown to be.
No I’m not. She’s a victim, that is true. But that’s not an excuse to be freed from legal obligations. It won’t be fair to the Aonos if they don’t get compensation. Miyuki is a minor and she’s the parent so it’s her responsibility. If she doesn’t then who will? Are you expecting the Aonos to just sweep it under the rug because they’re supposed to be kind? Are you forgetting the fact that their son almost committed suicide? The damage isn’t something that can simply be repaired with money. Yet that’s the only thing they asked and there’s nothing better that Miyuki’s mom can really offer.
Sorry we’ll have to agree to disagree. I think you’re clouded by feelings if you’re throwing the suicide at me as an appeal to empathy, of course I remember his pain. It would be one thing if it was something other than a civil case but I think it’s vindictive to pursue justice in such a way, it would be one thing if the daughter was facing the law herself but in the end the only one truly paying when it comes to the settlement is Miyuki’s mom. Sure that money affects Miyuki too but as a long time single mother those college savings likely make up most her savings. It’s the most childish ploy in the entire story that goes against the moral character they’ve built for the Aonos family since the start. You act like that settlement will someone ease their suffering but it’s just extra sauce rather than worthwhile closure, it’s petty plain and simple.
Also I just noticed, when the author mentioned that the compensation was money that she saved for Miyuki’s college education. It wasn’t to highlight the amount, but to show Eiji getting more and more of what Miyuki loses. That is the real compensation.
How do you intend to pursue justice then? One that doesn’t make the mom compensate in any way but reduce the damage. That money could be used to pay for Eiji’s mental health recovery. Getting punishment is one thing, getting compensated for the damages is another.
“it would be one thing if the daughter was the one facing the law…”
That’s exactly why she, the parent, has to be one to take it because Miyuki can’t. If Miyuki wasn’t a minor, I would retract everything I said. Besides, it’s just money. Miyuki’s mom herself said she’s capable of earning it.
“…likely make up most her savings”
That’s just your assumption. If she was in a desperate situation, she wouldn’t have refused the bribe money from Kondo’s dad. But we know she’s not that kind of person and I would like to believe that if the Aonos hadn’t asked for compensation first, she would’ve offered it herself. As adults, I’m sure they both would understand and would find it reasonable.
“…throwing the suicide as appeal to empathy” “it’s vindictive to pursue justice in such a way”
We’re talking about someone’s life here. Money is nothing compared to the life of person.
“…goes against the moral character”
But they aren’t obliged to be kind, especially in extreme situations like this. Just because someone is kind doesn’t mean they always have to be. They aren’t saints.
There is a difference between asking to pay for damages and extorting. They are not blackmailing her or making her a slave for life. I would find it out of character if the Aonos tried to get back on Miyuki and her after they’ve settled with everything.
PS: Sorry, our back and forth replies are getting longer. But I am enjoying this so I hope you continue as well.
Given the flow of events “justice” is already being done, her social life has crashed and her educational life ruined. I’m not sure why she’s been spared by the author by the law while everything fell on Kondo, given she played a major part in Kondo’s crimes but it would make more logical sense for her to face the law even if it just lead to probation or something.
“we’re talking about someone’s life here. Money is nothing compared to a life of a person” I could appeal to empathy too by saying you’re not being considerate of the damage done to Miyuki’s mom, we’re talking about her mom’s life too. Someone who is still single and clearly hurt by her past now facing a world of hate and despair due to her daughter. So much so that she’s has seemingly had a heart issue or something and has been in the hospital for a good while now… yet you’re more worried about Eiji who the author has wrote having basically god like luck and the whole universe doing everything it can to make things right and make his life better than ever lol. This petty extra justice you seem to value is harmful and there is no way to get around that when you consider the full story as is now.
Sure they’re not obligated to be kind but given they are written angelically and with Eiji written as very considerate and caring it’s out of character. The only personal excuse I can find for them is they somehow don’t know Miyuki’s mom was hospitalized due to them being busy with Eiji’s problems which would make the situation at least a little more understandable.
It’s a settlement, the world settlement implies it’s a civil case which means if she doesn’t “settle” she would have to fight back to avoid paying as much or at all. It technically is more like extortion then just “asking”
p.s. You’re good no hard feelings either or anything I don’t mind a good discussion.
“yet you’re more worried about Eiji who the author has wrote having basically god like luck”
Sure it might seem like he’s doing okay now and gaining a lot of good things, but trauma doesn’t go away in one night. He might have gained a lot of support and recognition, but that doesn’t change the fact that there was damage. Whereas, money can just be earned again. I may be exaggerating the damage on Eiji and ignoring the mother’s condition, but the same could be said about you towards Miyuki’s mother. As you’ve said, it’s possible for the Aonos to be unaware of her situation. If that was case, would you still say there were being vindictive?
“This petty extra justice you seem to value is harmful…”
Well I think the “petty extra sympathy” you have towards the mother is no different when you consider that it’s confirmed that the compensation was an amount that she can cover so there’s not much impact on her, only Miyuki. Although, we both wouldn’t want to think that she would just sit and make Miyuki earn it back herself so she’s likely going to work extra if Miyuki wanted to go to college. But then, I didn’t find much evidence to say that she is financially in a bad spot that would lead her to overexert herself. She said she hoped for the money to be used on Eiji’s recovery which makes me believe that she would have offered it herself. She likely didn’t because it might rub off the wrong way if she was the one who made the offer first, just like Kondo’s father.
“… justice is already being done, her social life has crashed and her educational life ruined”
There’s no compensation there, only punishment. Justice comes with both parts. If Ai and Endo didn’t exist, Eiji’s life would continue to be miserable. Miyuki getting punished won’t improve Eiji’s life. That’s where compensation comes in. It’s only fair to have someone fix or replace something if they broke it. Miyuki getting involved with Kondo and getting caught in a love hotel was her own doing. It has nothing to do with Eiji. On the other hand, Eiji meeting the good people like Ai and getting achievements is not the result nor a side effect of Miyuki getting punished. There was zero effort from anyone from Miyuki’s side to make that happen.
It’s not justice if only the perpetrator gets punished but the victim’s life doesn’t improve through the perpetrator’s effort. Regardless of Eiji’s current state, there has to be compensation. If there was no slander, no bullying and Eiji choosing to end his life was him being a sad boy after getting dumped, then my perspective would be different. Part of me wants to think that Eiji’s mom didn’t really want to ask compensation knowing they’re old friends, but might have felt the need to show legal action, being the parent. They could’ve gone through the court instead or talked about it personally with the kids. But the latter wasn’t likely possible given Eiji and Miyuki’s current state. It wouldn’t look right if she did no legal action after what her son went through.
Despite all that, I think it’d be nice if both parents get the chance to talk face to face and decide what’s best. I don’t mind the compensation part but Miyuki’s mom getting the cold treatment didn’t sit well for me. I don’t recall if it was due to the mom not taking the initiative to talk or the Aonos refusing or both. Either way, as adults I’m sure they could’ve talked it out and properly settle things.
Miyuki can no longer go to college in the future or go to any school… i wont be surprise that her mother will disown her… despite realizing her mistakes its too late to fix it.
It is NOT that serious
It’s not that serious his daughter cheated on her boyfriend not killed someone!
I also find myself hoping that the Aonos have mercy on Miyuki’s mother and place the blame solely on Miyuki to shoulder when she is an adult. Mrs. Amada has already suffered enough in life with her husband abandoning her and then trying to raise her treacherous daughter all on her own. Miyuki was the one who had started the cycle of betrayal and bullying to cover up her own mistakes, so Miyuki should be the one to blame and be punished!
I feel incredibly bad for Miyuki’s mom. Miyuki nearly killed a man in disgrace, for her own selfish and sadist desires. Her mom had nothing to do with it. Hope her mom gets to speak with Aono’s or atleast let Aono’s know she knows nothing about what happened. Hope author shows mercy on her.
Bro ??killed? Sadist? OK pall she just cheated and got manipulated and threatened to make choices she didn’t wanted…
She is as much as a victim as eiji her only real bad choice that she could easily avoid if she had a brain was ultimately cheating . After that she was deep in the hole any time she wanted to make the right choice or doubted her self she got threatened to be exposed and losing everything which she ultimately did.
Miyuki’s true reasons can be summed up in her own words:
— If Senpai leaves, the only man I’ll be with from now on is Eiji. Am I okay with that?
— Who’s that burglar cat?
— If I don’t do something quickly, Eiji will be taken from me.
Miyuki’s mother blames herself because she doesn’t know the truth; her daughter only uses people. She’s like Kondo, but at least Kondo didn’t know what it was like to be loved or have good role models. Miyuki did, but she saw them as objects to use.
From the way her mother speaks, Miyuki is basically a female version of her father
Will at least Miyuki’s mother won’t sell the house for settlement money. The good thing is the settlement is only from Miuyki’s college education funds because that way it won’t effect the mother’s lifestyle for she does not deserve to suffer the consequences of her daughter’s cheating and idiocy. I think the auther made sure the settlement only effect miyuki so she can’t have any bright future, like think about it miyuki had the delusional mindset of wanting to stay the model student at highschool even after cheating and betraying eiji but the irony is now she can’t go to college.
Its been awhile since we heard from Eris perspective. Is she still relevant or has she been written out of the story via self-deletion in a past chapter?
lets pray and hope she and miyuki at least are forgiven by the aonos and even be happy again and be friends with them again miyuki and her mother didnt deserve this, okay miyuki deserves it a little but she and her mother didnt know about this
Miyuki’s mother is Miyuki’s biggest victim. She is completely innocent of what her daughter did when she enjoyed toying with the love and trust of those who cared for her, believing she could do so without consequences.
Miyuki should stop whining about a relationship she didn’t care about abusing. Her initial reaction was that she wanted validation from more men; now she can seek it. She just has no right to interfere and bother Eiji.
dude i didnt mean that i meant that they both get a happy ending because if miyuki finally repents and changes in the aonos eyes, they forgive her and her mother and is a win win, so stop being so negative
Even if Miyuki repents and changes, there is no point in staying friends with Eiji and the Aonos. You become friends with someone because you like spending time with that person. Miyuki doesn’t feel that way towards Eiji. She just keeps thinking about Eiji a lot now because there’s no longer anyone by her side. Eiji used to be that person so now she’s filled with remorse. To Miyuki, Eiji was just a convenient person to have.
It’s not a win-win when only Miyuki gets something out of her relationship with Eiji and the Aonos. She deserves happiness, yeah I agree, but only happiness in a world without Eiji and the Aonos.
no there are some stories where a cheating woman repents and becomes a friend again
Honestly, I wouldn’t want such a tragic ending for Miyuki, but a happy ending doesn’t seem consistent with the development and personality she’s shown.
Miyuki is selfish and irresponsible for betraying and conspiring against Eiji without reason, but she’s also envious and possessive when she sees him with someone else. She’s also insecure, hungry for validation, and capable of being completely indifferent to the suffering she causes, constantly seeking to justify or deny the evil she enjoyed while believing she could get away with it. These are deep aspects of her personality.
Being aware that there are people like her in the world, and the fear that they’ll do to her what she did to Eiji, will make her even less capable of maintaining stable relationships than she already is.
Let’s not pray, Eiji already said is peace. Not everyone is deserving of forgiveness and you definitely don’t get to be friend with people who try to destroy to the point of suicide. Eiji already did her a great service by choose to not chastise and hate on her, his indifference and respect for their past is way more than most would give in that circumstance.
Now if we’re talking about forgiving the mom I’m all for it. I think they should drop the case against her as she shouldn’t pay for her daughter sins.
hey they shoud forgive and be friends with both of them again
Keep this in mind: Miyuki hates betrayal. She wouldn’t forgive someone who had done even a fraction of what she did to Eiji. Especially not if she knows that person also tried to betray her Amaten from the very beginning (when Miyuki tried to go to Eiji after seeing him with Ai).
Yes let’s forgive the kondo family while we’re at it and all sing kumbaya.
Are u an idiot? She Eiji was about to do sucide because of the mess she created and you are saying they should be friends again, and what guaranty you have that she didn’t try to break eiji’s current relationship yk she is a possessive type who can’t stand seeing her toy with another women. He should forgive her but be friends again hard pass she did not deserve to be his friend after what she done. And yeah he should forgive her mother cuz she was also a victim of her daughter’s foolishness.