—ᯛᮟᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᯏᮝᮑᮔᮑ’ᮣ ᮀᮕᮢᮣᮠᮕᮓᮤᮙᮦᮕ—
ᯖᮟᮧ ᮔᮙᮔ ᮙᮤ ᮕᮞᮔ ᮥᮠ ᮜᮙᮛᮕ ᮤᮘᮙᮣᯍ ᮇᮑᮣ ᮙᮤ ᮢᮕᮑᮜᮜᮩ ᮒᮕᮓᮑᮥᮣᮕ ᯗ ᮛᮕᮠᮤ ᮠᮥᮤᮤᮙᮞᮗ ᮠᮢᮕᮣᮣᮥᮢᮕ ᮟᮞ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙᯍ ᯗ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮓᮕᮢᮤᮑᮙᮞ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮜᮟᮦᮕᮔ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞᮼ ᮀᮕᮢᮘᮑᮠᮣ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮚᮥᮣᮤ ᮑ ᮖᮑᮓᮑᮔᮕ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮠᮥᮤ ᮟᮞᮺ ᮣᮕᮞᮣᮙᮞᮗ ᮝᮩ ᮟᮧᮞ ᮔᮕᮣᮙᮢᮕᮣᮼ
ᯐᮥᮤ ᮕᮦᮕᮞ ᮣᮟᮼᮼᮼ ᯗ ᮖᮙᮞᮔ ᮙᮤ ᮘᮑᮢᮔ ᮤᮟ ᮒᮕᮜᮙᮕᮦᮕ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮘᮑᮢᮒᮟᮢᮕᮔ ᮕᮞᮟᮥᮗᮘ ᮘᮑᮤᮢᮕᮔ ᮤᮟ ᮓᮘᮕᮑᮤᮺ ᮚᮥᮣᮤ ᮜᮙᮛᮕ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮝᮑᮞ ᮔᮙᮔᮺ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮗᮟ ᮑᮣ ᮖᮑᮢ ᮑᮣ ᮖᮢᮑᮝᮙᮞᮗ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮒᮕᮤᮢᮑᮩᮙᮞᮗ ᮘᮙᮝᮼ ᯏᮤ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮦᮕᮢᮩ ᮜᮕᮑᮣᮤᮺ ᯗ ᮔᮟᮞ’ᮤ ᮒᮕᮜᮙᮕᮦᮕ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ ᮕᮦᮕᮢ ᮔᮙᮔ ᮑᮞᮩᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮟ ᮔᮕᮣᮕᮢᮦᮕ ᮒᮕᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮢᮕᮑᮤᮕᮔ ᮣᮟ ᮘᮟᮢᮢᮙᮒᮜᮩᮼ
ᯗ ᮖᮕᮕᮜ ᮑ ᮣᮕᮞᮣᮕ ᮟᮖ ᮘᮑᮤᮢᮕᮔ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮔᮙᮣᮑᮠᮠᮟᮙᮞᮤᮝᮕᮞᮤ ᮣᮟ ᮣᮤᮢᮟᮞᮗ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᯗ ᮓᮑᮞ ᮘᮑᮢᮔᮜᮩ ᮒᮕᮜᮙᮕᮦᮕ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮙᮣ ᮝᮩ ᮟᮧᮞ ᮔᮑᮥᮗᮘᮤᮕᮢᮼ
ᮀᮕᮢᮘᮑᮠᮣ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮣᮕᮑᮢᮓᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮖᮟᮢ ᮑ ᮖᮑᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮖᮙᮗᮥᮢᮕᮼ ᮄᮟ ᮘᮕᮢᮺ ᮘᮕᮢ ᮒᮙᮟᮜᮟᮗᮙᮓᮑᮜ ᮖᮑᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮘᮑᮔ ᮣᮥᮔᮔᮕᮞᮜᮩ ᮦᮑᮞᮙᮣᮘᮕᮔᮺ ᮧᮘᮙᮓᮘ ᮜᮕᮖᮤ ᮘᮕᮢ ᮔᮕᮕᮠᮜᮩ ᮔᮕᮠᮢᮕᮣᮣᮕᮔᮼ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮟᮞᮕ ᮧᮘᮟ ᮖᮙᮜᮜᮕᮔ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮦᮟᮙᮔᮼ ᯐᮕᮓᮑᮥᮣᮕ ᮘᮕ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮛᮙᮞᮔᮕᮢ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮝᮟᮢᮕ ᮓᮟᮝᮠᮟᮣᮕᮔ ᮤᮘᮑᮞ ᮝᮟᮣᮤ ᮒᮟᮩᮣ ᮘᮙᮣ ᮑᮗᮕᮺ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮝᮙᮗᮘᮤ ᮘᮑᮦᮕ ᮒᮕᮕᮞ ᮜᮟᮟᮛᮙᮞᮗ ᮖᮟᮢ ᮑ ᮖᮑᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮙᮞ ᮘᮙᮝ ᮙᮞᮣᮤᮕᮑᮔ ᮟᮖ ᮑ ᮜᮟᮦᮕᮢᮼ
“ᯗ ᮓᮑᮞ’ᮤ ᮣᮤᮑᮩ ᮝᮑᮢᮢᮙᮕᮔ ᮤᮟ ᮩᮟᮥ ᮑᮞᮩᮝᮟᮢᮕᮼ”
ᯓᮦᮕᮢᮩᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮜᮙᮛᮕᮜᮩ ᮒᮕᮗᮑᮞ ᮤᮟ ᮖᮑᮜᮜ ᮑᮠᮑᮢᮤ ᮖᮢᮟᮝ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮔᮑᮩ ᮤᮘᮟᮣᮕ ᮧᮟᮢᮔᮣ ᮧᮕᮢᮕ ᮣᮥᮔᮔᮕᮞᮜᮩ ᮣᮠᮟᮛᮕᮞᮼ ᯓᮦᮕᮞ ᮤᮘᮕᮞᮺ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮗᮕᮑᮢᮣ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮧᮕ ᮝᮑᮞᮑᮗᮕᮔ ᮤᮟ ᮛᮕᮕᮠ ᮤᮥᮢᮞᮙᮞᮗ ᮧᮙᮤᮘ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮣᮥᮠᮠᮟᮢᮤ ᮟᮖ ᮤᮘᮕ ᯏᮟᮞᮟ ᮖᮑᮝᮙᮜᮩ ᮧᮕᮢᮕ ᮖᮢᮑᮗᮙᮜᮕᯉ ᮤᮘᮕᮩ ᮓᮟᮜᮜᮑᮠᮣᮕᮔ ᮙᮞ ᮑᮞ ᮙᮞᮣᮤᮑᮞᮤ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮝᮟᮝᮕᮞᮤ ᮤᮘᮕᮩ ᮧᮕᮢᮕ ᮝᮕᮤ ᮧᮙᮤᮘ ᮟᮥᮤᮣᮙᮔᮕ ᮠᮢᮕᮣᮣᮥᮢᮕᮼ
“ᮇᮘᮑᮤ ᮑᮒᮟᮥᮤ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙᯍ”
ᯗ ᮘᮑᮔ ᮠᮢᮕᮣᮣᮕᮔ ᮘᮙᮝ ᮖᮟᮢ ᮑᮞ ᮑᮞᮣᮧᮕᮢᮼ
“ᯗᮤ’ᮣ ᮒᮕᮤᮤᮕᮢ ᮙᮖ ᮩᮟᮥ ᮕᮨᮠᮜᮑᮙᮞ ᮙᮤ ᮢᮑᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮤᮘᮑᮞ ᮝᮕ ᮤᮕᮜᮜᮙᮞᮗ ᮘᮕᮢ ᮔᮙᮢᮕᮓᮤᮜᮩᮼ ᮄᮘᮑᮤ ᮧᮑᮩᮺ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙ ᮧᮟᮞ’ᮤ ᮘᮑᮦᮕ ᮤᮟ ᮗᮕᮤ ᮘᮥᮢᮤᮼ”
ᮇᮙᮤᮘ ᮤᮘᮑᮤᮺ ᮘᮕ ᮦᮑᮞᮙᮣᮘᮕᮔᮼ ᮇᮕ ᮘᮑᮦᮕᮞ’ᮤ ᮣᮕᮕᮞ ᮕᮑᮓᮘ ᮟᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮟᮞᮓᮕ ᮣᮙᮞᮓᮕ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮔᮑᮩᮼ
ᯚᮟᮟᮛᮙᮞᮗ ᮒᮑᮓᮛᮺ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮔᮕᮓᮙᮣᮙᮟᮞ ᮠᮢᮟᮒᮑᮒᮜᮩ ᮧᮑᮣᮞ’ᮤ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮢᮙᮗᮘᮤ ᮟᮞᮕᮼ ᮇᮘᮙᮜᮕ ᮙᮤ’ᮣ ᮤᮢᮥᮕ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮙᮤ ᮣᮠᮑᮢᮕᮔ ᮑ ᮩᮟᮥᮞᮗ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙ ᮖᮢᮟᮝ ᮥᮞᮞᮕᮓᮕᮣᮣᮑᮢᮩ ᮠᮑᮙᮞᮺ ᯗ ᮤᮘᮙᮞᮛ ᮙᮤ ᮧᮑᮢᮠᮕᮔ ᮣᮟᮝᮕᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮙᮞᮣᮙᮔᮕ ᮘᮕᮢᮼ ᯜᮟᮺ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ’ᮣ ᮚᮥᮣᮤ ᮑᮞᮟᮤᮘᮕᮢ ᮕᮨᮓᮥᮣᮕᮼ ᯏᮖᮤᮕᮢ ᮑᮜᮜᮺ ᯗ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮟᮞᮕ ᮧᮘᮟ ᮢᮑᮙᮣᮕᮔ ᮘᮕᮢᮼ
ᮄᮘᮕ ᯏᮟᮞᮟᮣ ᮥᮣᮕᮔ ᮤᮟ ᮣᮑᮩᮺ “ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙᮻᮓᮘᮑᮞ ᮓᮑᮞ ᮓᮟᮝᮕ ᮟᮦᮕᮢ ᮤᮟ ᮠᮜᮑᮩ ᮧᮘᮕᮞᮕᮦᮕᮢ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮜᮙᮛᮕᮣ ᮣᮟ ᮣᮘᮕ ᮧᮟᮞ’ᮤ ᮖᮕᮕᮜ ᮜᮟᮞᮕᮜᮩᮼ” ᮄᮘᮕᮢᮕ ᮧᮕᮢᮕ ᮤᮙᮝᮕᮣ ᮤᮘᮕᮩ ᮕᮦᮕᮞ ᮖᮕᮔ ᮘᮕᮢᮼ ᯗ ᮝᮑᮔᮕ ᮣᮥᮢᮕ ᮤᮟ ᮠᮑᮩ ᮤᮘᮕᮝᮺ ᮒᮥᮤ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮧᮑᮣᮞ᮵ᮤ ᮕᮞᮟᮥᮗᮘᮼ ᮀᮕᮢᮘᮑᮠᮣ ᯗ ᮑᮜᮜᮟᮧᮕᮔ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙ ᮤᮟ ᮒᮕᮜᮙᮕᮦᮕ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮣᮥᮓᮘ ᮘᮑᮠᮠᮙᮞᮕᮣᮣ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮣᮟᮝᮕᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮟ ᮒᮕ ᮤᮑᮛᮕᮞ ᮖᮟᮢ ᮗᮢᮑᮞᮤᮕᮔᮼ
ᮄᮘᮕ ᮟᮜᮔᮕᮢ ᯗ ᮗᮕᮤᮺ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮝᮟᮢᮕ ᯗ ᮢᮕᮑᮜᮙ᮪ᮕ ᮙᮤᮼ ᯛᮕᮕᮤᮙᮞᮗ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮒᮕᮙᮞᮗ ᮣᮥᮢᮢᮟᮥᮞᮔᮕᮔ ᮒᮩ ᮣᮥᮓᮘ ᮑ ᮛᮙᮞᮔ ᮖᮑᮝᮙᮜᮩ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮞᮟᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮣᮘᮟᮢᮤ ᮟᮖ ᮑ ᮝᮙᮢᮑᮓᮜᮕᮼ ᯗ ᮤᮘᮟᮥᮗᮘᮤ ᯗ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮤᮕᮑᮓᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮘᮕᮢ ᮤᮘᮑᮤᮺ ᮒᮥᮤ ᮠᮕᮢᮘᮑᮠᮣ ᯗ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮟᮞᮜᮩ ᮠᮥᮤᮤᮙᮞᮗ ᮝᮟᮢᮕ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮝᮟᮢᮕ ᮠᮢᮕᮣᮣᮥᮢᮕ ᮟᮞ ᮝᮩ ᮔᮑᮥᮗᮘᮤᮕᮢᮼ
ᯏᮖᮤᮕᮢ ᮤᮑᮣᮤᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮛᮙᮞᮔ ᮟᮖ ᮘᮑᮠᮠᮙᮞᮕᮣᮣᮺ ᮖᮙᮞᮔᮙᮞᮗ ᮑᮞᮩᮤᮘᮙᮞᮗ ᮗᮢᮕᮑᮤᮕᮢ ᮧᮟᮥᮜᮔ ᮒᮕ…
ᯏ ᮢᮕᮡᮥᮕᮣᮤ ᮖᮟᮢ ᮣᮕᮤᮤᮜᮕᮝᮕᮞᮤ ᮝᮟᮞᮕᮩ ᮘᮑᮣ ᮑᮜᮢᮕᮑᮔᮩ ᮑᮢᮢᮙᮦᮕᮔ ᮖᮢᮟᮝ ᮤᮘᮕ ᯏᮟᮞᮟ ᮖᮑᮝᮙᮜᮩᮼ ᮇᮘᮙᮜᮕ ᮙᮤ ᮧᮟᮥᮜᮔ ᮒᮕ ᮣᮤᮑᮞᮔᮑᮢᮔ ᮠᮢᮑᮓᮤᮙᮓᮕ ᮤᮟ ᮓᮟᮞᮣᮥᮜᮤ ᮑ ᮜᮑᮧᮩᮕᮢ ᮑᮞᮔ ᮣᮕᮕᮛ ᮑ ᮢᮕᮔᮥᮓᮤᮙᮟᮞᮺ ᯗ ᮘᮑᮦᮕ ᮑᮜᮢᮕᮑᮔᮩ ᮙᮞᮖᮟᮢᮝᮕᮔ ᮤᮘᮕᮝ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᯗ ᮧᮙᮜᮜ ᮠᮑᮩ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮖᮥᮜᮜ ᮑᮝᮟᮥᮞᮤᮼ ᯗᮤ ᮙᮣ ᮑ ᮣᮥᮝ ᯗ ᮓᮑᮞ ᮓᮟᮦᮕᮢ ᮒᮩ ᮥᮣᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮖᮥᮞᮔᮣ ᯗ ᮘᮑᮔ ᮣᮑᮦᮕᮔ ᮖᮟᮢ ᯛᮙᮩᮥᮛᮙ’ᮣ ᮓᮟᮜᮜᮕᮗᮕ ᮕᮔᮥᮓᮑᮤᮙᮟᮞᮼ
ᯗ ᮕᮦᮕᮞ ᮖᮙᮞᮔ ᮝᮩᮣᮕᮜᮖ ᮘᮟᮠᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮝᮟᮞᮕᮩ ᮧᮙᮜᮜ ᮒᮕ ᮥᮣᮕᮔ ᮖᮟᮢ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ’ᮣ ᮣᮑᮛᮕᮼ ᮇᮕ ᮘᮑᮦᮕ ᮜᮕᮖᮤ ᮑ ᮤᮢᮕᮝᮕᮞᮔᮟᮥᮣ ᮧᮟᮥᮞᮔ ᮙᮞ ᮘᮙᮣ ᮘᮕᮑᮢᮤ—ᮑ ᮧᮟᮥᮞᮔ ᮣᮟ ᮔᮕᮕᮠ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮙᮤ ᮧᮙᮜᮜ ᮒᮕ ᮔᮙᮖᮖᮙᮓᮥᮜᮤ ᮤᮟ ᮘᮕᮑᮜᮼ ᯗ ᮑᮝ ᮑᮧᮑᮢᮕ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮘᮙᮣ ᮤᮑᮜᮕᮞᮤᮣ ᮑᮢᮕ ᮒᮜᮟᮟᮝᮙᮞᮗ ᮙᮞ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮧᮟᮢᮜᮔ ᮟᮖ ᮜᮙᮤᮕᮢᮑᮤᮥᮢᮕᮼ
ᮃᮙᮞᮓᮕ ᮝᮩ ᮔᮑᮥᮗᮘᮤᮕᮢ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮓᮑᮥᮣᮕ ᮟᮖ ᮘᮙᮣ ᮣᮥᮖᮖᮕᮢᮙᮞᮗᮺ ᯗ ᮝᮑᮩ ᮞᮟᮤ ᮘᮑᮦᮕ ᮤᮘᮕ ᮢᮙᮗᮘᮤ ᮤᮟ ᮖᮕᮕᮜ ᮤᮘᮙᮣ ᮧᮑᮩᮼ ᮃᮤᮙᮜᮜᮺ ᮙᮤ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮖᮢᮥᮣᮤᮢᮑᮤᮙᮞᮗ ᮤᮘᮑᮤ ᮑᮜᮜ ᯗ ᮓᮟᮥᮜᮔ ᮔᮟ ᮧᮑᮣ ᮠᮢᮑᮩ ᮖᮟᮢ ᯓᮙᮚᮙᮻᮛᮥᮞ ᮤᮟ ᮖᮙᮞᮔ ᮕᮦᮕᮞ ᮗᮢᮕᮑᮤᮕᮢ ᮘᮑᮠᮠᮙᮞᮕᮣᮣᮼ
Miyuki’s true reasons can be summed up in her own words:
— If Senpai leaves, the only man I’ll be with from now on is Eiji. Am I okay with that?
— Who’s that burglar cat?
— If I don’t do something quickly, Eiji will be taken from me.
Miyuki’s mother blames herself because she doesn’t know the truth; her daughter only uses people. She’s like Kondo, but at least Kondo didn’t know what it was like to be loved or have good role models. Miyuki did, but she saw them as objects to use.
Will at least Miyuki’s mother won’t sell the house for settlement money. The good thing is the settlement is only from Miuyki’s college education funds because that way it won’t effect the mother’s lifestyle for she does not deserve to suffer the consequences of her daughter’s cheating and idiocy. I think the auther made sure the settlement only effect miyuki so she can’t have any bright future, like think about it miyuki had the delusional mindset of wanting to stay the model student at highschool even after cheating and betraying eiji but the irony is now she can’t go to college.
Its been awhile since we heard from Eris perspective. Is she still relevant or has she been written out of the story via self-deletion in a past chapter?
lets pray and hope she and miyuki at least are forgiven by the aonos and even be happy again and be friends with them again miyuki and her mother didnt deserve this, okay miyuki deserves it a little but she and her mother didnt know about this
Miyuki’s mother is Miyuki’s biggest victim. She is completely innocent of what her daughter did when she enjoyed toying with the love and trust of those who cared for her, believing she could do so without consequences.
Miyuki should stop whining about a relationship she didn’t care about abusing. Her initial reaction was that she wanted validation from more men; now she can seek it. She just has no right to interfere and bother Eiji.